State Support for Building CT Startup Ecosystem

November 6th, 2011 by Miles Leave a reply »

Through the efforts of the Connecticut Technology Council, DECD, Startup America and many others, I’m sure, the state approved a multi-year $625mil economic development package.  You probably heard that already.  But what does that mean on a practical level for startups?

Tuesday I hosted a group of entrepreneurs at Higher One to hear more about the details of the plan.  (Sorry for the packed house – many more people than expected.  We are moving soon to a new building with larger conference rooms.)

Matt NemersonKip Bergstrom and Casey Pickett presented the results of research and a plan for moving forward.  See below for the full deck.

The general take-away is that CI is getting $25mil more annually for 5 years.  At least $5mil a year is expected to go into building the startup ecosystem and the goal is to make an impact as fast as possible.  I heard Kip say he would like to stand up new incubators/accelerators in the next few months.  Sounds like there will be an RFP issued for matching funds from the state to support private efforts to do this in Stamford, New Haven, Hartford and New London/Storrs.

If I understand correctly, the Stamford Innovation Center is an example of the type of incubator/accelerator envisioned.  And perhaps YEI would be, as well, if open more broadly rather than focusing on Yale.   I imagine that the success and buzz around YCominator and Techstars serves as a draw. Plus, my guess is it is easier for the state to support things that are more tangible and physical like a physical incubator space.

Innovation Ecosystem – Startup Connecticut – 10-13-2011 – Version 3 2

While there was generally excitement to have attention to these issues, there were some questions like:

  • Will the state be able to execute quickly?
  • Will the state’s move crowd out private actors and then not follow through making the situation worse than it would otherwise have been?
  • Will the emphasis on scale, buy-in and metrics, bloat the effort until little is achieved?

(It was funny to see the roll reversal.  A roomful of entrepreneurs pitched on an idea.  They say: “good idea, but can you execute?”  Sounds like VCs ;-)

I’d love to see more activity happening.  That part excites me.  I do want to make sure that efforts make sense and are real solutions to real issues.  I have a theory that the choice of venue for a young entrepreneur has more to do with (a) social recognition and (b) having a good social life/quality of life than anyone likes to talk about.  People will comment on finding engineers or cost of this or that.  Those may be business issues although I think people often overcome them when the social part is there.  I wonder if that is being addressed in this plan?

Here’s a simple idea that David Fischer gave me.  What if you gave free rent/housing for one year to entrepreneurs to start in New Haven.  Rather than focusing on the office, make it easier for people to live here and experience the benefits.  If you want you could put encourage them to live close to each other or in the same building.  You hold some mixers and networking events and generally make them feel special and welcome.  Once they build the social network, momentum will kick in and some percentage will stay.

You could start this almost immediately.  Get a panel of judges.  Create a one-page application.  Require people to raise $25,000 of private money (could be their own).    Do as little due diligence as possible so as not to slow down the process or deter good people from joining.  Then make a fuss in the social media, online entrepreneurship world that New Haven is paying you to move to town.  Maybe even pay the airfare to get here.  (I think the closest I’ve heard to this idea is Startup Chile.  Do people know much about that program in practice?)

Would love to hear your thoughts on how to most effectively grow the startup ecosystem in New Haven and CT.

Advertisement
  • Bill Gordon

    Miles:

    Some excellent thoughts.  I think we should all spend some time riffing on your idea about other ways to ignite entrepreneurial ecosystems in places like New Haven and Stamford as part of the overall CT ecosystem.  As one of the two guys (Steve Smith being the other) that started the effort in Stamford that has led to the Stamford Innovation Center I can only say at this point that I am glad it is about to launch – but it has taken way too long – too much red tape, nickel and dime stuff and generally too many cooks in the kitchen at the City.  It has made it this far only because of the undying support of Kip Bergstrom, first in Stamford and then from his new post at DECD, and the fact that Patty Meagher had the patience to take the reins from me and slog on through some deep mud.  There have to ways to move quicker. 

    Your thought about the Chilean experiment is interesting – I have been wondering how it went.  Let’s collect some data and explore similar but different alternatives.  Combining other methods like the Chilean approach with incubators in Stamford, New Haven and beyond could be a good thing.  At the end of the day it is about the ecosystem(s).  Let’s find the quickest and lowest costs ways to continue to experiment and see what sticks!

    Bill Gordon 

  • Anonymous

    Love the role reversal idea Miles,… really!  I think it’s going to take the combination to work — State money and private sector action.  The State should not be in the business of indefinitely funding development, and if we as entrepreneurs want to be able to see a sustainable ecosystem, then we have to step up and make sure it’s built in the image that we’ll want to live with.  If we sit back and wait to be handed a solution, then our bad.

  • Kam Lasater

    What about something similar to the effort to get yale grads to nashville (is that the right city?). They offered internships and connected them into the social scene. State pays for the interns at local startups? I also like the Fischer proposed rent concept.

  • http://twitter.com/benberkowitz Benjamin Berkowitz

    +1 on the Dave Fischer Social Plan (That’s a scary thought!)
    I also like the idea of long term financial incentives for staying. What if a company that left the area in under three years from State investment had to give 10% of the company back to the fund.  The handcuffs would help a founder take the time to enjoy their surroundings and encourage them to adapt to a social life outside of Yale and ride out those first three years.  

  • David Fischer

    Let me second that Dave Fischer Social Plan – brilliant in every way!  We have to remember that while New Haven (and CT in general) is a fine place to live and work we are rowing upstream against the massive gravitational pull of places like Boston, NYC, and SF.  Doing something bold and different is the way to go over trying to copy their ecosystems.

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like there is agreement that there is more we can do and that there should be a strong entrepreneur led effort locally.  More specific ideas or concrete next action steps, welcome.

    Kam, I think your talking about Bulldogs in the Bluegrass (http://bulldogsacrossamerica.com/cities/default.aspx?C=1).  In the startup context, it sounds similar to Venture for America.

  • http://twitter.com/urbandata urbandata

    The successful start-up hubs are all located in walkable, transit-rich urban areas (the WSJ highlighted this this weekend in their piece about urban biotech hubs).  I hope the group will look more closely at what areas of Connecticut are actually likely to host and retain entrepreneurial clusters.  

    We are heavily investing in sprawling areas like Farmington, Storrs, and suburban Fairfield County which I do not believe can ever have the critical mass of a place like Kendall Square (US) or Cambridge (UK).  That’s a mistake.

    These maps show it most clearly: http://rustwire.com/2011/03/11/michigan-business-owner-soul-crushing-sprawl-driving-us-away/

blog comments powered by Disqus